Growth versus Value
One manner by which
professional investors segregate stocks in an effort to understand and
hopefully improve performance is to separate them into 3 categories - growth, value,
and core. Not a random classification, companies classified into these
categories have often exhibited similar performance and volatility
characteristics.
Growth stocks are securities
issued by companies which either have been growing rapidly or show signs
that they will do so imminently. These stocks will often have little or no
dividend as assets are needed to invest in expansion. Because of the
anticipated growth, these stocks will often trade at prices much higher than
average relative to earnings and/or book value. These stocks will also tend
to be more volatile than average, reacting more than others to interest rate
shifts, economic change, and relevant news.
Value stocks are securities
issued by companies that are in some way undervalued. The company may be
paying a higher than average dividend. There may be negative assumptions
that have overly hurt the price. Their may be risk issues deterring
investors while all other aspects of financial and operational health remain
in good order. Whatever the case, these stocks often trade at prices lower
than average relative to earnings and/or book value. Because of
this apparent discount and occasionally higher than average
yield, these stocks tend to be defensive in nature and therefore less
volatile.
Core stocks display either a
mix of value and growth characteristics or none at all, simply exhibiting
average pricing relative to earnings and/or book value. Large conglomerates,
which often have a mix of companies in various states of growth and
stagnation are typical core stocks. In the mutual fund arena, the word blend
is used instead of core because these funds will not only own core stocks
but will also have any combination of value and growth ones as well - a
blend.